The Role of Discourse and Text in the Construction of Organizational Identity

Authors

  • Davide Bizjak University of Naples Federico II

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19245/25.05.pij.5.2.1

Keywords:

discourse, functionalism, organisations, critical

Abstract

Functional approaches and practices can be seen as loci of knowledge production and preservation. The present paper provides a comprehensive reflection on the former by discussing in detail the concept of discourse and discourse analysis applied to organisational contexts. Indeed, language and discourse are the principal means by which institutions and organisations create their own social reality. With the aim to clarifying how the social world is constructed and construed through actions of intersubjective meaning-making processes and to avoid the emphasis placed only on micro-linguistic elements, Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) was introduced to raise the attention on the macro-social aspects of discourse within organisations.

 

References

Argyris, C., and Schon, D. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Barnard, C.I. (1938), The Functions of the Executives, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Bizjak, D. (2018), Diversity Management and Identity in Organisations: From Liminality to Inclusion, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Black, Max (1979), “More about Metaphor”, in A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 19-43, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bloor, M., and Bloor, T. (2007), The Practice of Critical Discourse Analysis: An Introduction, London: Hodder Alborn.

Bourdieu, P. (1990), The Logic of Practice (translated by R. Nice), Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Chouliaraki, L., and Fairclough, N. (1999), Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Corradi, G., Gherardi, S., and Verzelloni, L. (2010), “Through the Practice Lens: Where is the Bandwagon of Practice-Based Studies Heading?”, Management Learning, 41 (3): 265-283.

Crider, C., and Cirillo, L. (1991), “Systems of Interpretation and the Function of Metaphor”, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21 (2): 171-195.

Donnellon, A., Gray, B., and Bougon, M.G. (1986), “Communication, Meaning, and Organized Action”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 31 (1): 43-55.

Doolin, B. (2003), “Narratives of Change: Discourse, Technology and Organization”, Organization, 10 (4): 751-770.

Doyle, J.R., and Sims, D. (2002), “Enabling Strategic Metaphor in Conversation: A Technique of Cognitive Sculpting for Explicating Knowledge”, in A.S. Huff and M. Jenkins (eds), Mapping Strategic Knowledge, 63-85, London: SAGE.

Drew, P., and Heritage, J. (eds, 1992), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1989), Language and Power (3rd edn., 2015), London/New York: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (1992), Discourse and Social Change (15th edn., 2013), Cambridge: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (2000), New Labour, New Language?, London/New York: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2004), “Critical Discourse Analysis in Researching Language in the New Capitalism: Overdetermination,

Transdisciplinarity and Textual Analysis”, in L. Young and C. Harrison (eds), Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis, 103-122, London: Continuum.

Fairclough, N. (2005), “Peripheral Vision: Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies: The Case for Critical Realism”, Organization Studies, 26 (6): 915-939.

Feldman, M.S., and Orlikowski, W.J. (2011), “Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory”, Organization Science, 22 (5): 1240-1253.

Foucault, M. (1972), The Archaeology of Knowledge (translated by A. Sheridan), London: Tavistock Publications.

Gherardi, S. (2006), Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning, Oxford: Blackwell.

Gherardi, S. (2008), “Situated Knowledge and Situated Action: What Do Practice-Based Studies Promise?”, in D. Barry and H. Hansen (eds), The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization, 516-525, London: SAGE.

Giddens, A. (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Gioia, D.A. (1986), “Symbols, Scripts, and Sensemaking: Creating Meaning in the Organizational Experience”, in H.P. Sims and D.A. Gioia (eds), The Thinking Organization, 49–74, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Grant, D., Michelson, G., Oswick, C., and Wailes, N. (2005), “Guest Editorial: Discourse and Organizational Change”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18 (1): 6-15.

Hardy, C., and Phillips, N. (1999), “No Joking Matter: Discursive Struggle in the Canadian Refugee System”, Organization Studies, 20 (1): 1-24.

Hardy, C., Palmer, I., and Phillips, N. (2000), “Discourse as a Strategic Resource”, Human Relations, 53 (9): 1227-1248.

Heidegger, M. (1996 [1927]), Being and Time (translated by J. Stambaugh), New York, NY: SCM Press.

Heracleous, L.T. (2003), Strategy and Organization: Realizing Strategic Management, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heracleous, L.T. (2006), Discourse, Interpretation, Organization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Heracleous, L.T., and Hendry, J. (2000), “Discourse and the Study of Organization: Toward a Structurational Perspective”, Human Relations, 53 (10): 1251-1286.

Herzberg, F. (1959), The Motivation to Work, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Herzberg, F. (1979), “Motivation and Innovation: Who are Workers Serving?”, California Management Review, 22 (2): 60-70.

Hymes, D.H. (1964), “Introduction: Toward Ethnographies of Communication”, American Anthropologist, 66 (6): 1-34.

Hymes, D.H. (1972), “The Contribution of Folklore to Sociolinguistic Research”, in A. Paredes and R. Bauman (eds), Toward New Perspectives in Folklore, 42-50, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Jacobs, C.D., and Heracleous, L.T. (2005), “Answers for Questions to Come: Reflective Dialogue as an Enabler of Strategic Innovation”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18 (4): 338-352.

Jacobs, C.D., and Heracleous, L.T. (2006), “Constructing Shared Understanding: The Role of Embodied Metaphors in Organization Development”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42 (2): 207-226.

Koester, A. (2010), Workplace Discourse, London: Continuum.

Lakoff, G. / Johnson, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live By, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maslow, A.H. (1954), Motivation and Personality, New York, NY: Harper and Row.

Mayo, E. (1933), The Human Problems of an Industrial Organization, New York, NY: Macmillan.

Mayr, A. (2008), Language and Power: An Introduction to Institutional Discourse, London: Continuum.

Morgan, G. (1980), “Paradigms, Metaphors and Puzzle Solving in Organization Theory”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 25 (4): 605–622.

Morgan, G. (1983), “More on Metaphor: Why We Cannot Control Tropes in Administrative Science”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (4): 601–607.

Morgan, G. (1986), Images of Organization, Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

Morgan, G. (1996), “An Afterword: Is There Anything More to be Said About Metaphor?”, in D. Grant and C. Oswick (eds), Metaphor and Organizations, 227–240, London: SAGE.

Mumby, D.K., and Clair, R.P. (1997), “Organizational Discourse”, in T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse Studies Volume 2: Discourse as Social Interaction, 181-205, London: SAGE.

Munir, K.A., and Phillips, N. (2005), “The Birth of the ‘Kodak Moment’: Institutional Entrepreneurship and the Adoption of New Technologies”, Organization Studies, 26 (11): 1665-1687.

Oswick, C., Keenoy, T., and Grant, D. (2002), “Note: Metaphor and Analogical Reasoning in Organization Theory: Beyond Orthodoxy”, Academy of Management Review, 27 (2): 294-303.

Palmer, I., and Dunford, R. (1996), “Conflicting Uses of Metaphors: Reconceptualizing their Use in the Field of Organizational Change”, Academy of Management Review, 21 (3): 691-717.

Phillips, N., and Brown, J.L. (1993), “Analyzing Communication in and around Organizations: A Critical Hermeneutic Approach”, Academy of Management Journal, 36 (6): 1547-1576.

Phillips, N., Lawrence, T.B., and Hardy, C. (2004), “Discourse and Institutions”, Academy of Management Review, 29 (4): 635-652.

Pinder, C.C., and Bourgeois, V.W. (1982), “Controlling Tropes in Administrative Science”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27 (4): 641-652.

Renz, L.M. (2009), “Metaphor: Imagery Devices Used by Morgan to Describe Organizations as Culture and Psychic Prisons”, Emerging Leadership Journey, 2 (1): 54-65.

Sackmann, S. (1989), “The Role of Metaphors in Organization Transformation”, Human Relations, 42 (6): 463-485.

Sandberg, J., and Tsoukas, H. (2011), “Grasping the Logic of Practice: Theorizing through Practical Rationality”, Academy of Management Review, 36 (2): 338-360.

Sandberg, J., and Tsoukas, H. (2015), “Practice Theory: What it is, its Philosophical Base and What it Offers Organization Studies”, in R. Mir, H. Willmott and M. Greenwood (eds), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy in Organization Studies, 184-198, New York, NY: Routledge.

Schatzki, T.R. (2012), “A Primer on Practices: Theory and Research”, in J. Higgs et al. (eds), Practice-Based Education: Perspectives and Strategies, 13-26, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Schatzki, T.R., Knorr-Cetina, K., and von Savigny, E. (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London/New York: Routledge.

Swales, J.M. (1990), Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tienari, J., Søderberg, A.M., Holgersson, C., and Vaara, E. (2005), “Gender and National Identity Constructions in the Cross-Border Merger Context”, Gender, Work & Organization, 12 (3): 217-241.

Tsoukas, H. (1993), “The Road to Emancipation is through Organizational Development: A Critical Evaluation of Total Systems Intervention”, Systemic Practice and Action Research, 6 (1): 53-70.

Vaara, E., Kleymann, B., and Seristö, H. (2004), “Strategies as Discursive Constructions: The Case of Airline Alliances”, Journal of Management Studies, 41 (1): 1-35.

van Dijk, T.A. (1993), Elite Discourse and Racism, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

Wenger, E. (1998), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wittgenstein, L. (1958), Philosophical Investigations (2nd edn., translated by G.E.M. Anscombe), Oxford: Blackwell.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-24

How to Cite

Bizjak, D. (2020). The Role of Discourse and Text in the Construction of Organizational Identity. PuntOorg International Journal, 5(2), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.19245/25.05.pij.5.2.1